Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142966›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025

Investigation of differences in mechanisms of die filling between a compaction simulator and a rotary press.

Ben Kohlhaas, Jan Henrik Finke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ben KohlhaasInstitute for Particle Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Straße 5, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.
Jan Henrik FinkeInstitute for Particle Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Straße 5, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Die Filling is the critical process step in tableting as it determines the tablet weight and its variability as well as impacting tablet strength and defect propensity. Several studies have focused on modeling die filling on rotary presses, however none have investigated the matter on a compaction simulator. Therefore, the aim of this study is to characterize the die filling behavior on a compaction simulator and compare it to a laboratory scale rotary press. Special attention is paid to the complex interplay of process parameters, machine geometry and material properties. Experimental results are supported by a newly introduced physics-based calculation of the course of the exerted differential pressure as a main driver of die filling. On the compaction simulator, suction filling is shown to be more intense due to its geometry and elevated lower punch velocities, rendering paddle speed of the feed frame less crucial. On the rotary press, paddle rotation is necessary to ensure sufficient powder flow into the dies, especially at high production speed, due to a shorter filling time. An alternative fill cam geometry, where the punch is already pulled down to a certain extent before entering the feed frame, reduces the exerted suction pressure in the filling zone, giving generally lower filling yield for materials of limited flowability. The study offers a solid understanding of die filling on a compaction simulator and the underlying mechanisms. Together with the comparative experiments, the foundation for a model for rational scale transfer towards rotary presses is established.

Indexed as

Compaction simulatorDie fillingFlowabilityProcess transferRotary tablet pressSuction fillingTableting

Identifiers

PMID41142966
PMCPMC12549384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.