ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2025
Outcomes post kidney transplantation amongst First Nations Australians in the Northern Territory.
Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: 1)To compare graft and patient survival rates following deceased donor kidney transplantation in Northern Territory (NT) First Nations Australians between 2001-2011 and 2012-2021. 2)To compare transplant outcomes between First Nations and non-Indigenous Australians during 2012-2021. 3)To assess the impact of eplet mismatches and predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes II (PIRCHE) scores on transplant outcomes in First Nations Australians. Background: Despite advancements in transplant outcomes across Australia, uncertainty exists regarding improvements in graft and patient survival rates for NT First Nations Australians. No study has evaluated the impact of molecular matching on post-transplant outcomes for NT First Nations Australians. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving NT First Nations Australians transplanted between 2001-2021. Participants were divided into two groups: 2001-2011 and 2012-2021. For comparison, we also included non-Indigenous recipients transplanted during the 2012-2021 period. We analyzed graft and patient survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and assessed the association of eplets and PIRCHE scores with graft outcomes and Results: Five-year graft and patient survival rates were 46% and 66% in the 2001-2011 cohort compared with 69.7% and 83.1% in the 2012-2021 cohort. For non-Indigenous recipients (2012-2021), 5-year graft and patient survival were 90.5% and 97.6%. Higher eplet mismatch loads and PIRCHE scores were not associated with graft survival, patient survival, or time to rejection among First Nations Australians. Conclusion: Post-transplant outcomes for First Nations Australians have improved considerably, but they remain inferior to non-Indigenous Australians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.