Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142924›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2025

Shaping the Future of HTA in Italy: Insights from the Italian Health Policy Forum.

Paolo Sciattella, Roberta Laurita, Chiara Bini, Eugenio Di Brino, Dario Sacchini, Giandomenico Nollo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paolo SciattellaCentre for Economics and International Studies-Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy; paolo.sciattella@uniroma2.it (P.S.); chiara.bini@uniroma2.it (C.B.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-1895
Roberta LauritaDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Necchi, 7, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-6624
Chiara BiniCentre for Economics and International Studies-Economic Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy; paolo.sciattella@uniroma2.it (P.S.); chiara.bini@uniroma2.it (C.B.).
Eugenio Di BrinoHealth Policy Forum, SIHTA (Italian Society of Health Technology Assessment), 00144 Rome, Italy; eugenio.dibrino@unicatt.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7964-3348
Dario SacchiniResearch Center for Clinical Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Department of Healthcare Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; dario.sacchini@unicatt.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1581-3018
Giandomenico NolloItalian Society of Health Technology Assessment (SIHTA), Via Massimo Bontempelli 10, 00144 Rome, Italy; giandomenico.nollo@unitn.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9837-083X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of the European (EU) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Regulation 2021/2282 (EU HTAR) offers many opportunities, aimed at harmonizing HTA procedures and improving access to innovations; it also represents a significant challenge for the European healthcare system. Within the 2024 Health Policy Forum Italy meeting, different actors, stakeholders, and institutions had the opportunity to discuss major criticism and opportunities coming from the EU-HTA Regulation addressing future developments in the healthcare sector. Two groups, EU & Italy Pharmaceuticals and EU-Italy Medical Devices, worked distinctively on the EU HTAR by highlighting key issues that may pose challenges at both European and national levels, proposing potential solutions. The allocation of participants into two groups, according to their affiliation with either the pharmaceutical or the medical device sector, enhances the diversity of professional backgrounds and institutional perspectives, thereby fostering a more comprehensive and informed discussion. The recommendations highlighted by the two groups emphasize the need to promote cooperation among Member States, strengthen training for decision-makers, and develop a monitoring system to evaluate EU HTA's impact.

Indexed as

EU-HTA Regulationhealth technology assessmentmedical devicesmedicinal products

Identifiers

PMID41142924
PMCPMC12551063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.