ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Importance of ultradian oscillations in neurogenesis during development and its implications for spinal cord regeneration.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The formation of a functional nervous system during development and its maintenance in adulthood rely on precise regulation of neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation and differentiation. During neurogenesis, progenitor cells use various cellular and molecular mechanisms to balance these processes. Among these, dynamic signal encoding, specifically ultradian oscillations, which are regular protein fluctuations occurring over a few hours, has emerged as a key mechanism underlying NSC fate decisions. In adults, reactivation of quiescent NSCs, proliferation, and differentiation are also controlled by ultradian oscillations. Furthermore, these ultradian dynamics signals are modulated by microRNAs and are considered critical for the ability of neural progenitors to transition between different states. Altogether, these findings may have potential significance for our understanding of NSC reactivation and differentiation in the context of injury or neurodegeneration. The mammalian spinal cord harbours endogenous multipotent NSCs that respond to injury but mostly generate astrocytes and do not undergo neurogenesis. By contrast, many anamniotes regenerate spinal cord neurons from endogenous progenitors, despite the same molecular signalling pathways being activated, suggesting that subtle differences in how these pathways are regulated may result in different regenerative outcomes. Whether oscillatory dynamics could influence the reactivation and differentiation of NSCs upon spinal cord injury remains to be determined. This review explores the role of transcription factor ultradian oscillations in neurogenesis and how microRNAs modulate them. Additionally, we examine evidence for the role of ultradian dynamics in the reactivation of quiescent NSCs and their potential significance for regenerative neurogenesis in the context of spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.