ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
Sleep Fragmentation in TcMAC21 Mouse Model of Down Syndrome.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Researcher's guide to rodent models of Down syndrome: Recent insights and translational perspectives.STAR protocols · 2026Review
- Restoring RCAN1 dosage mitigates sleep and EEG abnormalities in a Down syndrome model.Neurobiology of disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background / Objective: Down syndrome (DS) is the most common chromosomal disorder worldwide, and approximately ¾ of individuals with DS demonstrate multifactorial sleep disturbances, including sleep apnea. As the effects of chromosome 21 triplication are complex, mouse models may provide valuable insights into the causal mechanisms of disordered sleep in DS. Although the recently developed transchromosomic TcMAC21 mouse model offers the closest genetic similarity to human DS, its sleep-wake architecture is unexplored. We hypothesized that TcMAC21 mice would exhibit sleep disruption similar to human DS, specifically with increased wakefulness and sleep fragmentation compared to the euploid controls. Methods: Using a non-invasive piezo-electric sleep recording system, we evaluated the sleep-wake architecture in male TcMAC21 (TS, n=9) and euploid (EU, n=9) male control mice under a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Analyzed metrics included: total sleep percentage, bout frequency, and bout length. Results: Compared to EU controls, TS mice exhibited a significant reduction in sleep bout duration (-29.0%, p = 0.02) during the dark phase, with primary effect during the first 8 hours, culminating in an overall decrease in total sleep percentage (-24.2%, p = 0.04). The light phase did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in total sleep percentage or sleep architecture. Conclusion: TcMAC21 mice demonstrated significant sleep fragmentation during the dark phase, potentially reproducing some aspects of sleep disruption in Down syndrome. Interestingly, these findings differed from descriptions of sleep in other DS animal models. Given the high degree of DS gene replication and non-mosaic nature of the TcMAC21 model, it may provide unique insight into the neurologic and anatomic mechanisms of sleep dysfunction in Down syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.