ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2025
From high- to low-density EEG for automatic classification of dream experiences during stage 2 of NREM.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a method to automatically identify dream experience (DE) and no experience (NE) during the sleep stage N2 of nonrapid eye movement (NREM). We investigated the use of machine learning (ML) to automatically identify when a subject is having a dream during NREM from electroencephalography (EEG) signals. We use permutation-based channel selection to identify the most informative EEG channels for the classification of DE and NE and to select a set of channels that allow focus on the most important areas of the brain at the scalp level. The results show that when the ML models are trained on a balanced dataset containing both DE and NE reports, along with high-density EEG, they can achieve a classification performance of up to 0.94 in accuracy, F1 score, precision and recall, an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic of 0.97, and a kappa of 0.88. Performance decreases while we reduce the number of channels, but it remains like using up to 30-40 EEG channels. We show that ML models trained on high-density EEG to classify NE and DE can identify whether a subject was dreaming, achieving an accuracy of 0.7 on a separate set of dream reports where subjects reported a dream experience without recall, and channel selection methods have shown that performance could increase by 0.02 when EEG channels are removed from the occipital area. Our results show a high classification performance for automatic dream detection and the need to reduce the number of EEG channels needed to create the ML models, thus obtaining low-cost portable devices that can be used in real-life scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.