ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Upper Eyelid Medial Fat Reduction and Pearl Grafting: A Modification and Review of Literature.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Medial Septal Fat Excision During Infrabrow Blepharoplasty for Medial Upper Eyelid Fullness: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With age, there is a progressive volume disparity between the prominent medial fat pad and the atrophic central fat pad of the upper eyelid. We present a literature review of upper eyelid fat redistribution techniques and describe a novel postseptal medial fat pad pearl grafting technique as an adjunct to upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Methods: Retrospective review was conducted of medial fat pad pearl grafting performed by a single surgeon between 2018 and 2024, with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Medial and central fat pad volumes were graded by a masked observer using the Oh scale. Patient charts were assessed for adverse events such as irregularity, lipogranuloma formation, or revision surgery. Results: A total of 60 patients underwent the procedure, of which 45 met the inclusion criteria (86 eyelids). The median age was 60 years (range 38-90 y), with 91.1% female patients. Follow-up was for an average of 8.2 months (range 3-40 mo). Adjunctive procedures included ptosis repair (41), lower blepharoplasty (16), and other (3). Central fat pad volumes significantly increased from an average grade of 0.92 preoperatively to 1.73 postoperatively ( Conclusions: Medial fat pad postseptal pearl grafting is a useful adjunct to upper eyelid blepharoplasty, with a favorable safety profile, minimal likelihood of lumpiness, and effectiveness in reducing fat pad disparity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.