Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142823›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

MAPPs assays for non-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment: best practices recommended by the European immunogenicity platform.

A C Karle, K L Kopp, R J Seward, S Tourdot, C Ackaert, M Gutknecht, E Cloake, N Smith, A Ducret

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A C KarleImmunogenicity and Mechanistic Immunology, Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
K L KoppCentre for Functional Assays and Screening, Research and Early Development, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
R J SewardPharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Andover, MA, United States.
S TourdotPharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Andover, MA, United States.
C AckaertIQVIA Laboratories In Vitro Immunology (ImmunXperts), Gosselies, Belgium.
M GutknechtImmunogenicity and Mechanistic Immunology, Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
E CloakeBioassay Department, Abzena Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
N SmithEarly Development Services, Lonza Biologics Plc, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
A DucretPharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the MAPPs (Major histocompatibility complex Associated Peptide Proteomics) assay by pharmaceutical companies, service providers, and academic laboratories is rapidly increasing, attesting to its increasingly pivotal role in biotherapeutic drug candidate design, selection, and mechanistic investigations. Implementation of the MAPPs assay is labor-intensive, necessitating a high level of expertise. Differences observed in protocols established by laboratories may lead to considerable variability in data quality, limiting inter-laboratory comparisons. To address these challenges, the Non-Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment working group (NCIRA) of the European Immunogenicity Platform (EIP) sought to provide comprehensive recommendations for establishing robust workflows that will ensure robust data and meaningful interpretation. Recognizing the improbability of the complete harmonization of protocols, we aimed to define and propose a set of best practices to maximize confidence in the data generated by laboratories. The work presented here reviews the pitfalls and limitations of the assay, proposes strategies to enhance assay sensitivity and robustness, and outlines approaches for data analysis, reporting, and interpretation. Additionally, the potential of the MAPPs assay for future applications such as clinical studies is discussed. By proposing measures and controls that support the development of high-quality MAPPs assays, we seek to improve their reproducibility and reliability for drug candidates' nonclinical immunogenicity risk evaluation.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomicsAnimalsEuropeHumansReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentPeptidescandidate rankingharmonization strategyimmunogenicityMAPPsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41142823
PMCPMC12549661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.