ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Mass spectrometry-based analysis of rheumatoid factor.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rheumatoid factor (RF) are autoantibodies that are found in approximately two thirds of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by potentially destructive inflammation of the joints. RF consists of polyclonal antibodies targeting the Fc part of immunoglobulin G. Despite its clinical relevance, RF is not specific for RA, and conventional assays for RF detection, predominantly solid-phase tests detecting IgM RF, suffer from poor harmonization and the disability to test more than one RF isotype. Methods: We studied RF using a mass-spectrometry-based approach in RF(+), RF(-) rheumatoid arthritis patients and in disease controls. This allowed evaluation of RF at the amino acid level, including the variable and hypervariable region part of RF. RF was captured on Fc coated microwell plates, isolated, digested into peptides and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. An initial proof-of-concept analysis was conducted comprising 12 samples, followed by a larger-scale experiment comprising 86 samples. Results: Principal component analysis and sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis demonstrated that RF(+) RA patients displayed peptides that were differentially expressed compared with disease control patients. Framework region-derived peptides, variable region-derived peptides as well as de novo sequenced peptides not present in the human proteome database, were found to be enriched in RF(+) sera compared to disease control sera. Interestingly, some of these peptides were also upregulated in sera from RF(-) RA patients. Furthermore, mass spectrometry analysis revealed different RF isotypes. In addition to IgM, also IgA and IgG isotypes were observed. RF-IgG2 isotype was observed in RF(+) as well as in RF(-) RA patients. Discussion: In summary, our findings highlight that mass spectrometry provides a platform for elucidating the heterogeneity and isotypic diversity of RF autoantibodies in RA, overcoming limitations inherent to current solid-phase RF assays. Upregulated de novo peptides were found, possibly related to the hypervariable regions of RF. Further validation using integrated proteomic and genomic approaches is required to confirm these novel peptides and their localization within the RF hypervariable regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.