ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Snapping triceps syndrome: a review of the literature and proposed operative treatment algorithm.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to conduct a review of the literature on snapping triceps syndrome and to provide an overview on the epidemiology, mechanism, clinical presentation, diagnostic techniques, and treatments of this condition. In addition, we evaluate available evidence base of the current treatments so to recommend appropriate operative techniques in snapping triceps syndrome. Methods: Clinical studies were searched in 5 databases for "snapping triceps" and other similar key search terms. A total of 24 relevant studies were identified. From these we extracted information about number and demographics of patients, presenting symptoms, treatments, and outcomes. Results: A total of 64 patients were recorded. 90.6% (58/64) of the patients had coexisting instability of the ulnar nerve and 64.1% (41/64) had concomitant symptoms of ulnar neuropathy. Surgeries were performed in 67.2% (43/64) of the patients. The snapping triceps was unrecognized during the index surgery of the elbow in as high as 44.2% (19/43) of the operated patients. An operative treatment algorithm was proposed for snapping triceps syndrome. Conclusion: Snapping triceps syndrome is a rare orthopedic condition but often misdiagnosed. The treatments are determined by the severity of presenting symptoms and the conditions which alter the triceps angle. In patients treated with surgery, it is crucial to make sure full resolution of the snapping by examining all dislocating structures during passive elbow motion and/or myoelectrical stimulation. Excellent results of surgery can be achieved with meticulous evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.