Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142755›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

From single cells to communities: Mathematical perspectives on bacterial quorum sensing.

Sara Sadr, Bahram Zargar, Marc G Aucoin, Brian Ingalls

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara SadrDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Bahram ZargarCREM Co Labs, 3403 American Drive, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Marc G AucoinDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Brian IngallsDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex social lives of microbes, defined by sophisticated communication networks and cooperative behaviors, play a pivotal role in their survival and adaptation. Central to these interactions is Quorum Sensing (QS), a mechanism widely used by bacterial species for population-scale communication and subsequent gene regulation. QS involves coordinated synthesis, release, and detection of signaling molecules known as autoinducers (AIs). By sensing the concentration of AI as a proxy for the local density of the bacterial population, QS orchestrates the modulation of target gene expression. The molecular foundations of QS have been revealed, but fundamental quantitative challenges remain in the pursuit of a complete understanding of QS dynamics. Mathematical modeling has become an essential tool for investigating QS dynamics at both single-cell and population levels. A variety of modeling approaches, including deterministic, stochastic, non-spatial, and spatial frameworks have been employed to explore the complexities of QS systems. We provide an overview of mathematical models developed to describe and analyze QS mechanisms and dynamics, highlighting their contributions and limitations. Looking ahead, QS modeling is poised to support synthetic biology, antimicrobial therapy, environmental management, and more, offering new strategies to manipulate bacterial behavior for improving biotechnological applications, combating infections, and optimizing industrial processes.

Indexed as

Bacterial communicationBacterial signalingMathematical modelingQuorum sensing (QS)Systems biology

Identifiers

PMID41142755
PMCPMC12546806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.