ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Greening vision: balancing clinical excellence and ecological sustainability in eye health.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of ophthalmic medicine has significantly improved global visual health but concurrently imposed substantial ecological costs, creating an environmental paradox between efficient treatment and sustainability. This review explores the multifaceted carbon footprint of ophthalmic practices through a three-dimensional analysis: spatially, revealing stark cross-national differences in surgical emissions; temporally, tracking the environmental impact of technological evolution from extracapsular cataract extraction to phacoemulsification and vitreous surgery; and technologically, highlighting the role of disposable instruments, biomaterials, and energy consumption. It further presents an innovation matrix for "green ophthalmology," encompassing technological breakthroughs, process optimizations, and behavioral interventions. The review emphasizes the need to integrate the "triple bottom line" (clinical, economic, environmental) into practice and policy, proposing future directions such as blockchain-based certification systems and standardized environmental assessment tools. Ultimately, it calls for multi-level actions-from individual clinicians to global governance-to reconcile high-quality eye care with ecological sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.