ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2025
Duodenal mucosal autotransplantation.
Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Closure of large defects and postresection strictures can be challenging to manage after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large duodenal lesions. Duodenal mucosal autotransplantation (DAT) may offer a new strategy for defect closure and stricture prevention in patients that undergo resection of large lesions in the duodenum. Methods: A 57-year-old female underwent piecemeal EMR of a duodenal adenoma involving 60% of the luminal circumference. A mucosal autograft (2 x 2 cm) was harvested from adjacent duodenum using standard EMR technique and fixed to the resection bed using helical tacks and hemostatic clips. This resulted in complete defect closure without luminal compromise. Results: On follow-up EGD at 6 weeks, we noted graft incorporation, intact helix tacks and clips, and no evidence of duodenal stricture formation. The recipient site showed healthy mucosa, confirmed by biopsy, and the donor site healed well. Histopathology revealed viable duodenal mucosa with submucosal fibrosis. EGD at 6 months revealed well-healed donor and recipient sites, without evidence of stricture formation. Conclusions: DAT is a feasible technique for closure of large duodenal defects and may reduce stricture risk. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term outcomes and broader applicability of this approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.