ArticleFood security2025
Do nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions work among ethnic minorities in Northern Vietnam amidst the COVID-19 crisis?
Article in Food security, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Undernutrition remains a significant challenge among ethnic minorities in Northern Vietnam, possibly due to limited diet diversity. Our study explored the potential of a nutrition-sensitive agriculture intervention (NSA) to improve diet quality among the Thai, H'Mong, and Dao communities using a mixed-methods approach. Conducted between December 2020 and July 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study involved 600 households across 36 clusters, divided into two treatment groups: one received nutrition and agricultural training, another received this training plus a variety of vegetable seeds, and a control group without any intervention. We focused on diet and crop diversity, especially in vegetables and legumes. Quantitative data were collected through one baseline and two end-line rounds to ensure sufficient statistical power, while qualitative data included 14 focused group discussions, seven in-depth interviews, and field notes from field assistants. Our findings revealed that diet diversity, particularly in vegetables and legumes, was limited among the H'Mong and Dao, underscoring the potential of NSAs to improve their diet. Market access and on-farm production were found to complement each other in enhancing both diet and crop diversity across all three communities. The impact of the NSA intervention highlighted the complexity of contextual factors, including initial conditions and the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which influenced the outcomes in unpredictable ways. Nonetheless, combining seed provision with nutrition and agricultural training emerged as a promising strategy to enhance both diet and crop diversity, particularly given the strong vegetable cultivation practices and limited market access in these communities. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12571-025-01580-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.