ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Contraceptive use in France in 2012 and 2022: a descriptive analysis of two repeated nationwide cross-sectional studies.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A decrease in oral contraceptive use, newly available methods, and the emerging role of midwives suggested meaningful changes in contraception use in France. With two repeated cross-sectional studies, we aimed to describe contraception use in France in 2012 and 2022, in the total population and across age groups. Methods: Using the French National Health Data System (SNDS) covering 99% of the population, we identified reimbursed contraceptive use in women 15-49 years in January 2012 and 2022: combined oral contraceptives (COC), progestogen-only pill (POP), injectable progestogen, copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD), implants, sterilization. Number of users, socio-demographic characteristics and healthcare providers were assessed. Sales data accounted for non-reimbursed OC. Findings: Amid stable prevalence of contraception use (6.67 million users in 01/2012 and 6.73 in 01/2022, or 47%-46% of women aged 15-49 years), COC use decreased by a third from 54% (n = 3,602,803) to 35% of users (n = 2,370,205) while remaining the most popular method. POP and Cu-IUD use doubled, up to 19% (n = 1,293,073) and 21% of users (n = 1,428,837) users, respectively. IUD and POP have become leading methods in women 30-39 years, concerning 44% of users (n = 951,649) and 20% of users (n = 428,138) of users, respectively, while 50% of women ≥40 years (n = 1,051,066) used IUD. From <0.5% in 2012 (n = 16,154), midwives prescriptions reached 13% (n = 859,819) of total prescriptions in 2022. Social disparities in IUD use grew. Interpretation: Our findings displayed profound changes over ten years towards more hormone-free contraceptive methods. Funding: The French National Health Insurance Fund (Cnam) and the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) via the Scientific Interest Group EPI-PHARE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.