ArticleSSM - population health2025
Differences across intersecting racial, ethnic, and gender identity in the spatiotemporal patterning of suicide clusters in the US from 2005-2020.
Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To identify spatiotemporal trends in suicide clusters across multiple intersecting sociodemographic groups of US adults from 2005 to 2020. Methods: US Vital Statistics data were used to calculate county-level suicide rates in adults from 2005 to 2020. Rates were calculated for 16 intersecting sociodemographic groups, defined by mutually exclusive combinations of race (American Indian/Alaskan Native (AIAN), Asian/Pacific Islander (API), Black, White), ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic), and sex (male, female). For each group, spatiotemporal suicide clusters were identified using the SaTScan space-time statistic, based on counties where suicide rates were higher (hot clusters) or lower (cold clusters) than expected. We also calculated the average proportion of deaths contained in clusters, to quantify the importance of clusters relative to total suicide rates. Results: Overall, 275 clusters were identified, comprising 11.4 % of total suicides. Clusters ranged from 1 among non-Hispanic Black women to 135 among non-Hispanic White men. The number and magnitude of hot clusters (RR > 1) increased over time among Hispanic White men and women, and the highest magnitude clusters were observed in non-Hispanic Native American women. No clusters were identified for Hispanic AIAN women or Hispanic API men. Hot clusters were most prevalent in Western counties across all groups. Cold clusters were most prevalent in urban counties. Conclusions: Suicide rates and spatial clusters have increased since 2005, with distinct patterning between sociodemographic groups. The identification of specific communities that may be at disproportional risk for suicide highlight opportunities to tailor individual- and population-level prevention efforts in emerging high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.