ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Anti-Mullerian Hormone and conception timing as predictors of live births in cancer patients using fertility preservation: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Whole ovary cryopreservation and transplantation: a narrative review of technological advances, biological hurdles, and clinical translation in fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Among women of childbearing potential aged 15-39, cancer incidence is 52.3 per 100,000 annually. Women newly diagnosed with cancer often have just 2-6 weeks to decide whether to pursue fertility preservation (FP) before commencing treatment. The recommended waiting period to conceive post-treatment ranges from 6 months to 5 years, depending on cancer type, treatment, and age. With >18 million young adult cancer survivors worldwide, identifying factors affecting fertility preservation and live birth outcomes is more critical than ever. This is the first systematic review to explore whether AMH levels before, during, or after chemotherapy predict pregnancy outcomes resulting from re-utilization of stored oocytes/embryos or spontaneous conception in cancer patients undergoing FP. It also evaluates the optimal timing for post-treatment AMH recovery and how this may inform fertility success and decision-making for cancer patients pursuing FP. Methods: A review of PubMed and Web of Science identified 458 studies until November 2024. After a full-text review of 38 studies, seven met the eligibility criteria: if they were peer-reviewed, in English, enrolled female cancer patients undergoing FP before chemotherapy, measured AMH, and reported pregnancy or live birth rates after chemotherapy. Study quality and relevance were categorized as high, moderate, or low. Of the seven studies, one was highly relevant, four were moderately relevant, and two were of lower relevance. Results: The majority of studies focused on patients with breast cancer or lymphoma, comprising three prospective and four retrospective designs. Oocyte cryopreservation emerged as the most commonly used fertility preservation method. Among those who used stored specimens, baseline AMH levels ranging from ~2.1 to 2.8 ng/mL were related to live birth rates of 35-42%. Notably, spontaneous conception was more frequent than assisted reproduction. AMH recovery timelines varied widely, with follow-up periods spanning 1 to 36 months, yet no clear optimal timeframe for ovarian reserve restoration emerged. Conclusion: In female cancer patients, pre-treatment Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels may offer valuable insight to help inform fertility preservation decisions aimed at achieving future live births. This first-of-its-kind systematic review lays the groundwork for future research by identifying key knowledge gaps and emerging areas of clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.