Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142629›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Anti-Mullerian Hormone and conception timing as predictors of live births in cancer patients using fertility preservation: a systematic review.

Hillary Klonoff-Cohen, Mounika Polavarapu, Neha Ramachandran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hillary Klonoff-CohenDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Mounika PolavarapuDepartment of Population Health, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States.
Neha RamachandranEvidence-Based Practice Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Among women of childbearing potential aged 15-39, cancer incidence is 52.3 per 100,000 annually. Women newly diagnosed with cancer often have just 2-6 weeks to decide whether to pursue fertility preservation (FP) before commencing treatment. The recommended waiting period to conceive post-treatment ranges from 6 months to 5 years, depending on cancer type, treatment, and age. With >18 million young adult cancer survivors worldwide, identifying factors affecting fertility preservation and live birth outcomes is more critical than ever. This is the first systematic review to explore whether AMH levels before, during, or after chemotherapy predict pregnancy outcomes resulting from re-utilization of stored oocytes/embryos or spontaneous conception in cancer patients undergoing FP. It also evaluates the optimal timing for post-treatment AMH recovery and how this may inform fertility success and decision-making for cancer patients pursuing FP. Methods: A review of PubMed and Web of Science identified 458 studies until November 2024. After a full-text review of 38 studies, seven met the eligibility criteria: if they were peer-reviewed, in English, enrolled female cancer patients undergoing FP before chemotherapy, measured AMH, and reported pregnancy or live birth rates after chemotherapy. Study quality and relevance were categorized as high, moderate, or low. Of the seven studies, one was highly relevant, four were moderately relevant, and two were of lower relevance. Results: The majority of studies focused on patients with breast cancer or lymphoma, comprising three prospective and four retrospective designs. Oocyte cryopreservation emerged as the most commonly used fertility preservation method. Among those who used stored specimens, baseline AMH levels ranging from ~2.1 to 2.8 ng/mL were related to live birth rates of 35-42%. Notably, spontaneous conception was more frequent than assisted reproduction. AMH recovery timelines varied widely, with follow-up periods spanning 1 to 36 months, yet no clear optimal timeframe for ovarian reserve restoration emerged. Conclusion: In female cancer patients, pre-treatment Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels may offer valuable insight to help inform fertility preservation decisions aimed at achieving future live births. This first-of-its-kind systematic review lays the groundwork for future research by identifying key knowledge gaps and emerging areas of clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Anti-Mullerian Hormonecancerfertility preservationneoplasmpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41142629
PMCPMC12545013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.