Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

SUNTEL pilot study: first school-based integration of the ugly duckling sign and a dedicated e-learning platform with peer education for melanoma prevention.

Ignazio Stanganelli, Serena Magi, Elisabetta Costa, Matelda Medri, Franca Gentilini, Chiara Scutellà, Daniela De Zerbi, Giorgia Ravaglia, Silvia Gerosa, Federica Zamagni and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ignazio StanganelliSkin Cancer Unit, IRCCS IRST Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Serena MagiSchool of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Elisabetta CostaGraphic Design and Multimedia "Good Sun Good Skin" project, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Forlì, Italy.
Matelda MedriSkin Cancer Unit, IRCCS IRST Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Franca GentiliniIOR Scuola, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Forlì, Italy.
Chiara ScutellàIOR Scuola, Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo, Forlì, Italy.
Daniela De ZerbiScientific High School "Alfredo Oriani", Ravenna, Italy.
Giorgia RavagliaSchool of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Silvia GerosaSchool of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Federica ZamagniEmilia-Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Unit, IRCCS IRST Romagnolo Institute for the Study of Tumors "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Chiara DoccioliClinical Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
Sara GandiniDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Maria Costanza CipulloDirectorate General for Student Affairs, Inclusion, and Career Guidance, Prevention and Health Education Unit, Ministry of Education, Rome, Italy.
Saverio CainiCancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention, and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Educational initiatives among young people are pivotal in promoting healthy behaviors, yet only a few studies to date have used peer education in schools to convey health messages for melanoma prevention. Here we report the results of a peer-education-based skin cancer prevention program combined with teledidactics (SUN Education and TELematic Learning - SUNTEL) targeting high school students in Italy. Methods: In 2023-2024, thirty third-year high school students attended training sessions to become peer educators and then conducted interventions across first-year students using a multimedia platform. Students targeted by the peer-education intervention completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires to assess changes in their knowledge, attitudes and behaviours regarding melanoma prevention. Marginal homogeneity tests were used to compare responses in the pre- vs. post-intervention questionnaires. Results: The study population included 323 students (56.7% boys) mostly aged 14-16 years. Most participants had fair/light dark skin (>97%); 24% had freckles, and over one third developed skin rash often/always after UV exposure. Students' knowledge about melanoma risk factors and prevention, and attitude about UV exposure, changed significantly after the intervention, e.g., students wanting to use a tanning bed/lamp dropped from 9.6% to 3.8% (p-value <0.001), and those aware that using a tanning bed/lamp is as risky as tanning in the sun rose from 75.4% to 90.5% (p-value <0.001). Knowledge of the ABCDE rule rose from 7.5% to 96.6%; for the ugly duckling sign, the change was from 9.1% to 91.2%. Conclusions: e-learning/web-based tools and peer-education proved highly effective in enhancing students' knowledge regarding melanoma prevention and recognition, proving comparably or even more effective compared to teachers-/physicians-led educational approaches. Notably, this is the first school-based program to introduce the "ugly duckling" sign, a simple and reproducible rule for early melanoma detection. Sustained message reinforcement and parental involvement will be key to achieving lasting behavioral change in sun safety.

Indexed as

e-preventionmelanomapeer educationsecondary schoolugly duckling

Identifiers

PMID41142611
PMCPMC12545009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.