Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142587›Full record

ArticleBJA open2025

Erector Spinae Plane block with fascial plane catheter for the Early Analgesia of Rib fractures in trauma (ESPEAR): a multicentre feasibility randomised trial.

David W Hewson, Jessica Nightingale, Reuben Ogollah, Adam Brooks, Lauren Blackburn, Benjamin J Ollivere, Matthew L Costa, Tim Egan, Peter Bates, Ian Tyrrell-Marsh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acute Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit.Current pain and headache reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David W HewsonAnaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Jessica NightingaleOrthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Reuben OgollahNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Applied Health Research Building, University Park, University of Nottingham, UK.
Adam BrooksEast Midlands Major Trauma Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Lauren BlackburnEast Midlands Major Trauma Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Benjamin J OllivereOrthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Matthew L CostaOxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tim EganAnaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Royal London Hospital, Bart's Health, London, UK.
Peter BatesOrthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Bart's Health, London, UK.
Ian Tyrrell-MarshDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
Nigel M BedforthAnaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traumatic rib fractures cause significant acute pain. Patients are at risk of hypoventilation, atelectasis, hypoxia, retained secretions, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and death. Effective analgesia is thought to reduce these adverse outcomes. There is widespread variation in analgesic treatments given to patients including oral, intravenous, and epidural routes of administration. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block, a novel regional analgesic technique, may be effective, but high-quality evidence is lacking. Methods: To determine if a definitive trial of ESP block and catheter in rib fractures is possible, we conducted a multicentre, randomised, controlled pilot study with feasibility assessment. Adults with rib fractures were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either (i) ESP blockade and catheter, or (ii) placebo ESP blockade and catheter, both for 72 h. In addition, all participants received multimodal analgesia. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate (target: ≥1.11 participants/site/month), retention rate (target: ≥80%), and trial acceptability assessed by staff interview. Pre-specified red-amber-green criteria were agreed to determine feasibility of a future definitive clinical trial on this topic. Results: Twenty-five participants (mean [standard deviation] age 57 [16] yr, number of rib fractures 5 [3]) were recruited from three UK major trauma centres at a rate of 0.69 participants per site per month. Retention to 6-week follow-up was 80%. Based on our criteria, the current study design is not feasible for adoption into a definitive trial. For future research in this area, we recommend substantial modification to (i) the intervention, (ii) means of bias reduction, and (iii) timing and nature of outcome measure assessments. Conclusions: Based on pre-specified criteria, a definitive examination of the clinical effectiveness of ESP block in the analgesic management of adults after blunt force chest wall injury is only feasible if substantial amendments to trial processes piloted in this study are undertaken. An open-label assessment of single-shot ESP block, applying patient-reported average pain intensity of the first 24 h as the primary outcome, and conducted at sites with established ESP analgesic pathways, may overcome the most significant feasibility barriers identified by the present study. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN49307616.

Indexed as

analgesiachest traumaerector spinae plane blockregional anaesthesiarib fractures

Identifiers

PMID41142587
PMCPMC12550286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.