Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Long-term outcome and complications of acute correction of canine antebrachial deformities with patient-specific three-dimensional printed osteotomy and reduction guides in 15 dogs.

Emmanouil Tzimtzimis, Scott Rutherford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emmanouil TzimtzimisFrank. Pet Surgeons, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Scott RutherfordFrank. Pet Surgeons, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the owner-perceived long-term outcome and complications following acute correction of antebrachial deformities in dogs using patient-specific, three-dimensional (3D)-printed osteotomy and reduction guides and internal fixation. Methods: Retrospective study of 15 dogs (20 limbs). Medical records of dogs with antebrachial deformities corrected using patient-specific 3D-printed osteotomy/reduction guides and internal fixation with bone plates and a minimum of 1 year of owner follow-up were reviewed. Data collected included patient and surgical details, perioperative, short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes, as well as complications. Pre-surgical planning involved Computer-Aided Design (CAD) subjective segment orientation, from which patient-specific osteotomy and reduction guides were created. Results: All but one (19/20) limb had full function, and one limb had acceptable function at a mean owner follow-up time of 23 months. The mean long-term Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) and Canine Orthopedic Index (COI) scores were 4.4 and 3.5, respectively. The only minor complication was the breakage of the ulnar plate (1 limb). There were two types of major (I) complications: surgical site infection (3/20 limbs, 15%) and implant-related soft tissue irritation (4/20 limbs, 20%), both of which were treated successfully with implant removal. There were no intraoperative, major (II) or catastrophic complications. Clinical significance: The acute correction of canine antebrachial deformities aided by patient-specific, 3D-printed osteotomy and reduction guides resulted in excellent long-term outcomes. Complications encountered were surgical site infection and implant-related soft tissue irritation. All complications were successfully treated.

Indexed as

3d-printed guidesantebrachialcomplicationscorrective osteotomyoutcome

Identifiers

PMID41142565
PMCPMC12547448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.