SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Quantitative risk assessment for infectious disease introduction in animal populations: a comprehensive review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Windborne Dispersal of Arthropod Vectors as a Pathway for Lumpy Skin Disease Virus Introduction into South Korea: A Multi-Species, Source-Attributed Modelling Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Qualitative risk assessment of Japanese encephalitis virus introduction and transmission in Pacific Island countries and territories.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Can public-domain datasets be leveraged to identify factors associated with the occurrence of African swine fever in europe?Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Quantitative risk assessments (QRA) are valuable decision-support tools for estimating disease introduction risks in animal populations. Methods: This review analyzed peer-reviewed QRA studies published between 2010 and 2024 that focused on risk of introduction, aiming to identify methodological trends and challenges. Results: From the 1,933 studies screened, only 34 (2%) met inclusion criteria, primarily assessing risk through movements of live animals ( Conclusion: Key gaps included limited coverage of certain animal species, pathogens, and consequence assessments, with a predominant focus on import risks. Addressing these limitations can strengthen future QRAs as input for animal disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.