ArticleGland surgery2025
Classification of breast cancer molecular subtypes based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging using machine learning approach.
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in ultrasound for preoperative molecular subtyping of malignant breast tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Varying patterns of angiogenesis are observed across molecular subtypes of breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for identifying molecular subtypes of BC using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and superb microvascular imaging (SMI). Methods: In this prospective study, 191 BC patients with 193 lesions were enrolled. Clinical data, CEUS parameters, and SMI features were collected; recursive feature elimination was applied for feature selection. Random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR) were trained to distinguish molecular subtypes, and their diagnostic performances were compared. Model interpretability was achieved using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: BC lesions were randomly assigned to training (n=135) and test (n=58) cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Fivefold cross-validation with five repetitions was utilized for hyperparameter tuning. SVM effectively distinguished luminal subtypes, achieving area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.955 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.914-0.996] for training and 0.874 (95% CI: 0.769-0.979) for testing. RF outperformed other models for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressed subtype, with AUC of 0.944 (95% CI: 0.902-0.986) and 0.872 (95% CI: 0.768-0.975) in training and test cohorts, respectively. LR excelled in differentiating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), yielding AUC of 0.846 (95% CI: 0.758-0.933) and 0.824 (95% CI: 0.704-0.943). Conclusions: Incorporating CEUS and SMI features into an ML approach may enhance the diagnostic capacity for distinguishing molecular subtypes of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.