Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142548›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2025

Development and validation of deep learning models for qualitative classification of benign and malignant enlarged cervical lymph nodes based on ultrasound images.

Hong Yuan, Juan Ruan, Wen Wen, Jingyan Liu, Yulan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hong Yuan *Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Juan Ruan *Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wen WenDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jingyan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yulan PengDepartment of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enlargement of cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) is a common clinical response to lesions in the neck as well as in other parts of the body. Accurate qualitative diagnosis of lymph nodes can provide important reference information for clinical decision-making. While histopathological diagnosis remains the gold standard for differentiating benign from malignant CLNs, it is an invasive procedure. Ultrasonography serves as a non-invasive imaging modality widely employed in clinical practice for the preoperative evaluation and qualitative assessment of CLNs; however, its diagnostic accuracy is operator-dependent. In this study, we investigated ultrasound image features between benign and malignant CLNs and developed deep learning (DL) models for the qualitative diagnosis of CLNs. Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed CLNs via ultrasound-guided biopsy from January 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively included. The gold standard was histopathological diagnosis. Ultrasound features of CLNs were documented, and their value in differentiating benign from malignant CLNs was assessed using univariate analysis. DL models were developed to qualitatively diagnose the benign and malignant CLNs. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy curves, recall curves, and loss curves. Results: A total of 3,014 CLNs from 2,697 patients were included in this study, with 1,489 classified as benign cases and 1,525 as malignant cases. Almost all DL models demonstrated satisfactory performance in qualitative diagnosis of CLNs, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.56 to 0.81, with the VGG16 model exhibiting the best performance with an AUC of 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.86], accuracy of 0.73, sensitivity of 0.71, and specificity of 0.74. In comparison to ultrasonography, the VGG16, ResNet101, and ResNet50 models showed significantly superior predictive performance (P<0.05). Conclusions: DL models utilizing ultrasound images demonstrated promising performance in the qualitative diagnosis of CLNs. This approach enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative ultrasound assessment, thereby allowing a subset of patients to avoid unnecessary biopsies and optimizing clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Cervical lymph nodes (CLNs)deep learning (DL)diagnosisultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41142548
PMCPMC12552555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.