ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Developing a medication safety self-assessment tool for high-alert medications in community pharmacies.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-alert medications are recognised as those carrying heightened risk of causing significant patient harm when used erroneously. Objective: To develop a high-alert medications self-assessment tool for Finnish community pharmacies. Methods: The tool was developed using a three-phase Delphi method and is based on the Institute for Safe Medication Practices´ Medication Safety Self Assessment® for High-Alert Medications, which comprises 380 items. A pre-Delphi round was first conducted to assess tool's applicability for Finnish pharmacies, followed by two Delphi rounds with a multidisciplinary expert panel evaluating the applicability and desirability of each item. A consensus rate of 70 % was defined. Following the Delphi rounds, the tool was finalized through refinement, removal of duplicates, and reorganization. Results: Consensus was reached on 114 items, resulting in a finalized self-assessment tool organized into eight sections covering medicine groups such as insulin and oral diabetes medicines, anticoagulants, opioids, immunosuppressants, methotrexate, and over-the-counter high-alert medications. After the first Delphi round, 33 items were accepted without changes and 97 were revised. After the second Delphi round, 77 items were transferred to the final tool as such, 35 were modified and 21 were removed. Conclusion: The developed high-alert self-assessment tool offers a structured method for evaluating existing practices and implementing targeted safety measures, addressing a specific need in community pharmacies, where such resources are limited. While further validation and implementation research are needed, the tool represents a practical step toward enhancing medication safety and promoting continuous improvement in pharmacy practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.