ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
The impact of patient information on prescribing errors: Insights from pharmaceutical interventions.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prescribing Errors in Iraqi Intensive and Cardiac Care Units: A Qualitative Investigations of Pharmacists' Perceptions, Determining Factors, Outcomes and Management Strategies.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medication errors are more likely to occur in patients with complex conditions, where appropriate prescribing requires accurate and comprehensive patient information. Inadequate use of such information, such as overlooking laboratory results or patient weight, can lead to dosing errors or contraindicated prescriptions, even with electronic checking systems. This study aimed to analyze prescribing errors detected through pharmaceutical interventions, focusing on the patient information in the hospital information system. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 9774 pharmaceutical interventions performed between April 2019 and March 2020. Of these, 3372 interventions related to patient information stored in hospital information system were included. Prescribing errors were categorized into five patient-specific information categories: allergy information, laboratory data, concomitant drugs, patient weight, and patient status and history. Demographic and prescription data were analyzed, and a heatmap was developed to visualize high-risk areas. Results: Among the included interventions, 1352 (40.1 %) prescriptions involved corrections of prescribing errors, with laboratory data being the most frequently utilized patient information source ( Conclusion: Laboratory data were the most frequently used information source, to prevent prescribing errors. The risk heatmap demonstrated weekends, pediatric patients, and renal dosing as high-risk areas. These findings suggest that future information systems should enhance the utility of laboratory data and incorporate tailored alerting strategies focused on high-risk patient conditions and clinical settings, such as real-time lab data alerts or weight-based dosing calculators, and potentially explore the use of AI for proactive error prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.