Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142487›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

Cannabis and Nicotine Substance Use Coercion During the Perinatal Period.

Peyton Groves, Callie Laubacher, Yesmina Salib, Erin Mickievicz, Virginia Duplessis, Nicole Molinaro, Dara D Méndez, Katherine Guyon-Harris, Ruben G Martinez, Judy Chang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Peyton GrovesDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Callie LaubacherDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yesmina SalibDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Erin MickieviczDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Virginia DuplessisFutures Without Violence, San Francisco, California, USA.
Nicole MolinaroWomen's Center and Shelter, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dara D MéndezDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Katherine Guyon-HarrisDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ruben G MartinezDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Judy ChangDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Natacha M De GennaDepartments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Maya I RagavanDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Perinatal intimate partner violence (IPV) and perinatal cannabis and nicotine product use are common and associated with negative maternal-infant health outcomes. Substance use coercion (SUC), which involves abusive partners' controlling behaviors related to substance use, has not been studied for cannabis and nicotine products. Perinatal individuals may be particularly vulnerable to SUC, and this study aims to explore how cannabis and nicotine SUC manifests among perinatal survivors. Methods: We conducted virtual, semi-structured, 45-minute retrospective interviews with 19 IPV advocates and 15 perinatal IPV survivors. Participants were recruited through local IPV agencies and an online recruitment repository. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a deductive-inductive thematic analysis approach. Two research team members individually coded each transcript and met to resolve discrepancies. Results: Key themes emerged relating to survivors' use, interpersonal coercive tactics, and systems-level control. Specific findings included (1) survivors using substances to cope; (2) abusive partners coercing survivors through withholding, controlling, and punishing substance use; (3) shame and stigma are key drivers of coercion; (4) partners hinder cessation efforts; and (5) child protective services and health care are systems used by abusive partners to control and manipulate perinatal survivors of IPV. Discussion: The findings demonstrate that cannabis and nicotine products are used to coerce and control survivors of IPV. Future work should focus on developing survivor-centered interventions within systems to better support perinatal IPV survivors using cannabis and nicotine products. This study highlights the impact of cannabis and nicotine SUC on perinatal individuals and underscores the need to consider SUC when providing resources or treatment.

Indexed as

cannabisintimate partner violencenicotineperinatal periodpostpartumpregnancysubstance use coerciontobacco

Identifiers

PMID41142487
PMCPMC12549175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.