ArticleNeurophotonics2025
Improving neuroimaging headgear placement robustness using facial-landmark-guided augmented reality.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NeuroCaptain v2 - Interactive Three-Dimensional fNIRS Optode and Probe Montage Design Platform Based on Blender.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Accurate and consistent probe placement is crucial in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electroencephalogram (EEG) experiments, especially in longitudinal and group-based studies. Both operator experience and subject head shape variability can affect placement accuracy. Aim: We aim to develop an easy-to-use software, NeuroNavigatAR (NNAR), utilizing augmented reality (AR) and machine learning to estimate and display in real-time the subject's cranial and head landmarks to guide consistent headgear placement. Approach: By applying a facial recognition toolbox to the image frames extracted from a video camera, we can obtain and continuously track subject-specific three-dimensional facial landmarks. Separately, we have precomputed a robust linear transformation between facial landmarks and key cranial landmarks, including nasion and preauricular points, using a large public head-model library consisting of over 1000 subjects. These allow us to rapidly estimate subject-specific cranial landmarks and subsequently render atlas-derived head landmarks to the subject's camera stream. Results: An open-source graphical user interface implementing this AR system has achieved a speed of 15 frames per second using a laptop. A median 10-20 position error of 1.52 cm was found when using a general adult atlas and is further reduced to 1.33 cm and 0.75 cm when using age-matched atlas models and subject-specific head surfaces, respectively. NNAR demonstrated consistent head-landmark prediction errors across repeated measurement sessions; there is also no statistically significant difference in accuracy across age groups. Conclusions: NNAR is an easy-to-use AR headgear placement monitoring tool that is expected to significantly enhance consistency and reduce setup time for fNIRS and EEG probe donning across a wide range of studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.