ArticleJournal of public health research2025
Early cancer detection: Analysis of a comprehensive screening program in a private clinic in Peru.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early cancer detection is crucial for improving patient prognosis and survival. However, in Latin America, the implementation of screening programs faces economic and logistical barriers. Design and methods: This study evaluates the utility of an early detection program in a private clinic in Peru. A prospective study was conducted at the clinic's Oncology Center between 2017 and 2019. The sample comprised 31,057 patients who underwent routine examinations, including mammograms, biopsies, and blood tests. Patients with a previous diagnosis of primary cancer were excluded. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-squared test to assess the effectiveness of the early detection service. Results: The annual prevalence of cancer diagnosis among apparently healthy patients was 0.7%. Breast cancer was the most frequently diagnosed type (40.7%), with a significant difference observed between cases with positive (50.0%) and negative (2.3%) screening results. Most cases were in early clinical stages (stages 0 and 1, 58.4%), with a homogeneous distribution across groups ( Conclusions: The preventive service proved to be highly effective in early detection of cancer, especially in patients with no apparent symptoms. However, limitations were identified, such as the incidence of false negatives in some tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.