ArticleStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2025
Clinical Outcomes Following Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement - A Meta-Analysis.
Article in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Torrential Tricuspid Regurgitation in Complex Adult Congenital Heart Disease.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Four-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after tricuspid valve replacement using a novel bovine pericardial valve bioprosthesis.JTCVS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, yet it remains an undertreated entity. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option, with multiple novel systems demonstrating early safety and efficacy. The objective of this study is to systematically review and synthesize the clinical outcomes of transcatheter heart valve systems. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted from database inception through March 31, 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients undergoing TTVR for severe or torrential TR, reporting at least one clinical outcome. Pooled event rates were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed by valve type, and meta-regression explored potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies comprising 1017 patients were included. The mean age was 73 ± 9 years, and 71.2% were female. The weighted in-hospital and 30-day mortality were 1.37 and 2.49%, respectively. New permanent pacemaker implantation occurred in 7.98%, with highest rates observed in EVOQUE recipients (11.64%). Only 3% of patients had greater than or equal to severe TR at follow-up, and only 12% remained in New York Heart Association functional class III/IV. Subgroup analysis revealed lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality with EVOQUE but higher permanent pacemaker implantation compared to other valves. Conclusions: TTVR is a feasible and safe intervention for patients with severe TR, providing significant functional improvement and TR reduction. Robust, longer-term randomized controlled trials with standardized outcome reporting and clinical endpoints are urgently needed to define durable clinical benefit and guide optimal device selection for patients with severe TR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.