Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142357›Full record

ArticleMaterials and structures2025

Microstructure of magnesium silicate hydrate pastes influenced by carbonate and mixing method.

M H N Yio, E Bernard, C Dewitte, H Chen, T C Chan, R J Myers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials and structures, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M H N YioDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1003-5317
E BernardDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
C DewitteEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Concrete and Asphalt, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
H ChenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
T C ChanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
R J MyersDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the microstructure of magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H) pastes prepared with MgO and silica fume from different sources but of comparable properties, with varying sodium carbonate (NC) contents, using two mixing methods: conventional Hobart-style paddle mixing and low-speed ball-mill mixing. The latter method significantly improved silica fume dispersion and particle packing, resulting in a denser microstructure and substantially higher compressive strength compared to conventional mixing. A NC content of 2.5 wt.% was identified as optimal for enhancing microstructure and reducing porosity in conventionally mixed samples, while no clear effect of NC content observed in ball-milled ones. Brucite was detected in NC-containing samples by thermogravimetric analysis, but not by X-ray diffraction, indicating its poor crystallinity. Compressive strength increased with M-S-H formation and decreasing brucite content. These findings highlight the importance of optimising particle packing for improving the microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium silicate binders. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1617/s11527-025-02837-0.

Indexed as

BruciteMagnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H)Mechanical performanceMicrostructurePorosity

Identifiers

PMID41142357
PMCPMC12549767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.