ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2025
Optimizing QACT Frequency in Proton Therapy: Analysis of Standard Guidelines Across Treatment Sites.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dosimetric impact of daily skin surface variations in kidney stereotactic ablative proton therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of adaptation frequencies and factors in offline in offline adaptive proton therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anatomical changes during proton therapy are typically monitored using quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans. However, excessive QACTs can increase patient burden, resource use, and health care costs. This study evaluates the impact of implementing standardized minimum QACT frequencies across treatment sites. Materials and Methods: Adult patients treated with proton therapy before October 2024 at the Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center were reviewed. Head and neck (HN), thorax, and pelvis prostate patients were newly analyzed; cranium and breast guidelines were drawn from prior published work. Based on this, guidelines for minimum QACT frequency were established. The implementation impact was evaluated by comparing QACT usage and adaptive planning rates before (October 2019-April 2023) and after (August 2023-October 2024) guideline deployment. A 1-sided Student Results: A total of 681 patients were analyzed prior to guideline implementation and 381 patients afterward. Guidelines were developed for breast, cranium, HN, thorax, and pelvis prostate sites. Following guideline implementation, QACT frequency significantly decreased overall (median reduced from 3 to 2 per patient, Conclusion: Establishing standard minimum QACT frequencies led to a significant reduction in the number of QACTs performed across several treatment sites. These findings support the utility of structured QACT guidelines to enhance resource efficiency and reduce patient burden in proton therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.