Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142278›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025

Enhancing aortic anastomotic integrity: ex vivo evaluation of reinforcement techniques using Teflon-felt sandwich with mattress sutures.

Hironari No, Kenji Iino, Hirofumi Takemura, Chihiro Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hironari NoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641 Japan.
Kenji IinoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0051-1092
Hirofumi TakemuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641 Japan.
Chihiro WatanabeFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The success of aortic surgery depends on the durability and hemostatic properties of anastomotic techniques to prevent complications such as bleeding, thromboembolic events, and anastomotic disruption. This study evaluated the tensile strength of different suturing techniques ex vivo to assess their suitability for aortic procedures. Methods: Aortic wall specimens were obtained from porcine ascending aortae and anastomosed to vascular grafts using a 5-0 polypropylene monofilament suture. Four different suturing techniques were evaluated: simple interrupted sutures (Group A, Results: The simple interrupted suture technique incorporating a TFS with horizontal mattress sutures (Group D) demonstrated significantly superior tensile strength compared with the other techniques ( Conclusion: The TFS technique demonstrated superior tensile resilience among the studied methods, suggesting its potential advantage in aortic surgery. These findings provide a strong theoretical foundation for optimizing anastomotic techniques and warrant further in vivo investigation to validate their clinical applicability in enhancing surgical outcomes. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-025-02043-1.

Indexed as

Aortic artery anastomosisPolytetrafluoroethyleneSurgical anastomosisSuture techniquesTeflon-felt sandwichTensile tension test

Identifiers

PMID41142278
PMCPMC12549481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.