Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41142260›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Multicenter prospective study.

Gianenrico Rizzatti, Bertrand Napoléon, Fabrice Caillol, Stefano Francesco Crinó, Germana de Nucci, Khanh Do-Cong Pham, Marc Giovannini, Sarah Leblanc, Silvia Della Torre, Laurent Palazzo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Methodology Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) for Pancreatic Neoplasms: Results From an International Survey.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gianenrico RizzattiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Bertrand NapoléonEndoscopy Unit, Hopital Prive Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5866-8132
Fabrice CaillolEndoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-0942
Stefano Francesco CrinóGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4560-8741
Germana de NucciGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8758-654X
Khanh Do-Cong PhamMedicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Marc GiovanniniEndoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Sarah LeblancEndoscopy Unit, Hopital Prive Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.
Silvia Della TorreOncology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy.
Laurent PalazzoEndoscopy Unit, Clinique du Trocadéro, Paris, France.
Pia Clara PafundiEpidemiology and Biostatistics Facility, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Maria Cristina Conti BellocchiGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Cristiano SpadaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Alberto LarghiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for treatment of both functional (F-) and non-functional (NF-) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). We performed a large prospective multicenter study to evaluate safety and effectiveness of EUS-RFA in patients with F- and NF-PanNETs. Patients and methods: Patients with F- (≤ 2 cm) and NF-PanNETs (15 mm-25 mm) were prospectively enrolled over a 43-month period. The primary aim was safety, defined as rate of adverse events (AEs). The secondary aim was effectiveness defined as complete disappearance of the hormonal secretion syndrome in F- PanNETs, whereas for NF-PanNETs, complete response was defined as absence of enhancing tissue and of detectable lesion at magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography scan and Gallium-positron emission tomography, respectively. The EUSRA 19G needle was used in all patients. After treatment completion, follow-up was performed for 1 year. Results: During the study period, a total of 60 patients were enrolled, 30 with insulinomas and 30 with NF-PanNETs (mean lesion size 14.5 ± 4.5 mm). In 78.3% of patients, a single RFA session was performed. Overall, AEs occurred in nine of 60 patients (15%), in four patients (13.3%) with insulinomas and in five (16.7%) with NF-PanNETs, with only one severe AE. Complete insulin hypersecretion symptom resolution was obtained in 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) with insulinomas, whereas for NF-PanNETs, complete radiological response was obtained in 22 of 25 patients (88%) with long-term follow up. Conclusions: Our prospective international multicenter study demonstrated that EUS-RFA is highly safe and effective for the treatment for both F- and NF-PanNETs.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasonographyEndoscopy Upper GI TractIntervention EUSPancreasRFA and ablative methods

Identifiers

PMID41142260
PMCPMC12550746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.