ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Targeting macrophage-myofibroblast transition with
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Mechanism and Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine Nano-Formulations in the Treatment of Renal Fibrosis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: The AECS was qualitative analyzed by UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS. Potential targets of AECS were predicted, and RIF disease targets were collated from databases. A Venn diagram was generated using the EVenn platform, and drug-active ingredient-target network diagrams were constructed with Cytoscape 3.10.1 software. The PPI network was generated through the STRING database, and GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were executed via the DAVID platform. Molecular docking predictions of active ingredients binding with core targets were conducted using the CB-Dock2 platform. Finally, the anti-RIF effect of AECS was evaluated in an adenine-induced rat model. Results: A total of 64 chemical constituents were identified in the AECS. 97 common targets for treating RIF were identified through mining multiple databases. These key targets, particularly AKT1, EGFR and IL6, mediated biological functions such as protein phosphorylation and regulated several signaling pathways, including PI3K/Akt. Molecular docking studies demonstrated that ingredients like licochalcone A exhibited strong binding affinity with hub genes such as AKT1, EGFR and IL6. In an RIF rat model, treatment groups showed reduced renal tissue damage. Furthermore, treatment with AECS significantly ameliorated renal dysfunction in RIF rats, along with a downregulation of RIF markers α-SMA and fibronectin. Compared to the AECSL group, the LST and AECSH groups (300mg/kg/d) exhibited more significant therapeutic effects. Ultimately, RIF model rats showed increased expression of pan-macrophage marker CD68 and M2-specific marker CD206, along with α-SMA co-expression, indicating differentiation into MMT cells displaying CD68 Conclusion: Our study is expected to provide the pharmacological mechanisms by which CS may be a promising anti-RIF drug for future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.