ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Analysis of breast region segmentation in thermal images using U-Net deep neural network variants.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer detection using thermal imaging relies on accurate segmentation of the breast region from adjacent body areas. Reliable segmentation is essential to improve the effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis systems. Methods: This study evaluated three segmentation models-U-Net, U-Net with Spatial Attention, and U-Net++-using five optimization algorithms (ADAM, NADAM, RMSPROP, SGDM, and ADADELTA). Performance was assessed through k-fold cross-validation with metrics including Intersection over Union (IoU), Dice coefficient, precision, recall, sensitivity, specificity, pixel accuracy, ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, and Grad-CAM heatmaps for qualitative analysis. Results: The ADAM optimizer consistently outperformed the others, yielding superior accuracy and reduced loss. Among the models, the baseline U-Net, despite being less complex, demonstrated the most effective performance, with precision of 0.9721, recall of 0.9559, specificity of 0.9801, ROC-AUC of 0.9680, and PR-AUC of 0.9472. U-Net also achieved higher robustness in breast region overlap and noise handling compared to its more complex variants. The findings indicate that greater architectural complexity does not necessarily lead to improved outcomes. Discussion: This research highlights that the original U-Net, when trained with the ADAM optimizer, remains highly effective for breast region segmentation in thermal images. The insights contribute to guiding the selection of suitable deep learning models and optimizers for medical image analysis, with the potential to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis using thermal imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.