ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
A Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-World Study of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Older Patients With NSCLC.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atezolizumab + Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Lung Cancer in Japan.Cancer science · 2026Observational
- Disproportionality Analysis and Timing of Drug-Associated Guillain-Barré Syndrome Onset Based on the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy for older patients with NSCLC is limited. This real-world study compared the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (ACT) with those of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (PCT) for older patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 288 patients 65 years or older with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC who received PCT or ACT as first-line treatment at 13 institutions in Japan. After one-to-one propensity score matching, overall survival (OS), the incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, and all-grade pneumonitis of the PCT and ACT groups were compared. Results: After propensity score matching, 54 patients were included in each of the groups. OS did not significantly differ between the PCT and ACT groups. The median OS was 16.6 months for both groups. Compared with the PCT group, the ACT group had a hazard ratio of 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.74; Conclusions: ACT may be associated with a more favorable safety profile than that of PCT for the Japanese population; therefore, ACT could be considered a treatment option for older patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.