ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Provider Behavioral Determinants and Preferences for Lung Cancer Screening Implementation: A Brief Report.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Implementation of lung cancer screening is suboptimal. Understanding health care provider preferences and behavior is important for implementation. In this work, provider preferences for lung cancer screening implementation and self-reported determinants of lung cancer screening behavior were reported using the theoretical domains framework. Methods: In this mixed-methods evaluation, health care providers at nine Veterans Affairs were surveyed to list factors influencing their decision to screen patients for lung cancer in free-text responses and rank implementation strategies by usefulness in clinical practice. Free-text data were coded and mapped to the theoretical domains framework. Quantitative ranking data were descriptively analyzed overall and by specialty (primary care versus radiology), clinic setting (hospital versus community), and provider type (physician versus advanced practice provider). Results: Of 234/254 eligible providers analyzed, most were primary care (83.8%), community-based (52.1%), and physicians (66.2%). Respondents identified social influences (69.2%), knowledge (55.6%), and environmental context and resources (15.4%) as influential behavioral determinants. Overall, patient reminders (29.9%), provider reminders (26.1%), and learning collaboratives (24.4%) were reported most frequently as useful implementation strategies. Strategy preferences differed by specialty, practice setting, and provider type: primary care (30.1%), physician (34.2%), and hospital-based (33.0%) providers most frequently ranked patient reminders; radiology providers most frequently ranked learning collaborative (42.1%); advanced practice providers (24.1%) and community-based providers (27.0%) most frequently ranked provider reminders as most useful. Conclusions: Designing implementation strategies that target three behavioral determinants (social influences, knowledge, and environmental context and resources) and are tailored to providers' preferences may effectively change providers' lung cancer screening behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.