ArticleThe journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
Clinical Anatomy and Ultrasound Bootcamp for Anesthesiology Residents: A Pilot Study and Lessons Learned.
Article in The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound is a modern foundational tool used by anesthesiologists for peripheral nerve blocks. Clinicians performing hands-on ultrasound training on patients presents unique challenges, and the use of human anatomical donors has become a common substitute. With that, whereas ultrasound training sessions are common, they do not often include basic science anatomy reviews. This study explores an anatomist-led clinical anatomy review and physician-led ultrasound training session for first (n = 7) and second (n = 11) year anesthesiology residents. Methods: Residents attended a 2-hour anatomy review on prosected anatomical donors by anatomists prior to physicians facilitating an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block training session on undissected donors. The session covered the interscalene, supraclavicular, femoral, sciatic, and transversus abdominis plane ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. Data was collected using presurveys and postsurveys and assessments and analyzed. Results: The session was found to be useful and significantly improved the residents' confidence across 14 domains related to the anatomy and approach to ultrasound for the given peripheral nerve blocks. All the participants (18, 100%) felt it was very useful having undissected anatomical donors side by side to dissected ones during the session. Knowledge acquisition also improved based on the significant increase in score on the 8-question assessment ( Conclusions: The residents found this activity valuable and useful, especially learning from both undissected and prosected donors. With this approach, residents could compare the ultrasound image to the physical anatomy, which led to an increase in the residents' knowledge and confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.