ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic literature review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term brain pressure monitoring via a discrete microimplant; a first-in-human safety and initial efficacy trial in adults and children with hydrocephalus.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Malfunction: The Importance of Topogram Image Observation.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Progress and Challenges in Joining for Precision Endoscope Fabrication.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic literature review sought to examine telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring devices, evaluate their operating principles and applications in hydrocephalus management, and highlight their advantages over traditional ICP monitoring methods. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search using Medical Subject Headings terms was conducted in the Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, and Embase databases for articles published in English. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a strict selection process was followed. Three reviewers independently examined the full texts of the selected articles. Results: A total of 300 articles were retrieved, with 52 meeting the inclusion criteria after removing duplicates and noneligible studies. Telemetric ICP monitoring has been studied since the 1980s, but research remained limited until 2011 (16 [31%] studies), although it increased significantly thereafter (36 [69%] studies). The Raumedic Neurovent-P-tel was introduced in 2009, and 22 of the 36 studies published since 2011 focused solely on Raumedic devices. Likewise, after the Miethke Sensor Reservoir was released in 2015, interest in this field grew, with 9 studies evaluating Miethke devices between 2017 and 2024. Since 2019, 4 studies have reported experiences using both Raumedic and Miethke devices. Among the total of 52 studies, 11 (21%) focused on pediatric patients, 10 (19%) focused on adults, 22 (42%) included both age groups, and 9 (17%) did not specify patient age. Conclusions: Telemetric ICP monitoring has emerged as a valuable tool in managing hydrocephalus, offering continuous, noninvasive monitoring that enhances diagnostic accuracy and treatment adjustments. This review highlights the increasing adoption of these devices and their potential to improve clinical outcomes while reducing hospital admissions and invasive interventions. Despite challenges such as high initial costs and sensor drift, technological advancements and further research could enhance their reliability and expand their applications in neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.