ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2025
Living well guide: a nurse-led development and validation of a printed resource for cardiometabolic care.
Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health education materials are vital resource for health improvement for those with cardiometabolic diseases (CMD). Health education resources can be a valuable aid in nursing practice, reinforcing health education messages and as a structured approach to health education with the patient; and a resource for patients as they self-manage in the community. Aims: To develop and validate a nurse-led health education resource for those with CMD. Methods: The study, carried out from March to September 2022, included four stages: a systematic literature review, a qualitative exploratory study, construction of the health education resource, and validation of content and appearance by experts and the target audience. Content validity index (CVI) and Binomial tests were used to analyse each validation stage. Values of CVI equal to or greater than 0.80 were considered as valid. Results: The health education booklet consists of 26 pages, and it approaches educational content including understanding CMD, healthy eating, physical activities, weight management, stopping smoking and alcohol use, medication use, sleep importance, stress management, and multidisciplinary healthcare team follow-up. In the content validation, experts and target audience assigned a global CVI of 0.92 and 0.99, respectively, which was considered adequate. Conclusion: The health education booklet proved to be a valid educational tool in content and appearance. It was considered understandable by patients and experts, having feasible use in health education on lifestyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.