Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141970›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Does educating a patient about lumbar disc herniation affect the treatment compliance and outcome? A systematic review.

Mariana B Morais, Sara Nunes-Sequeira, Carla Reizinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana B MoraisFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sara Nunes-SequeiraFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carla ReizinhoNeurosurgery Department, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Unidade Local de Saúde de Lisboa Ocidental, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is a wide-ranging published literature around low back pain management. However, heterogeneity of selection criteria and outcomes limits the ability for an accurate line of evidence. One of the main causes of low back pain is lumbar disc herniation. There are some gaps of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of educating lumbar disc herniation patients on its treatment compliance and outcome. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of educating lumbar disc herniation patients on its treatment compliance and outcome. Methods: This systematic review searched 3 databases from January 2000 to March 2023. All full-text English studies (randomized clinical trials and observational studies) examining outcomes in lumbar disc herniation patients were eligible for inclusion. Results: Five studies with a total of 1046 lumbar disc herniation patients were included in this study. The mean age of participants ranged from 40 to 60 years old, and 36.63 %-58.00 % were female. Functional outcome was reported in all studies and symptomatic outcome comprised 3 domains, leg pain, back pain and general pain. Other variable outcomes included work status, quality of life and symptoms improvement satisfaction. Discussion: This study showed some heterogeneity in the types of outcomes used across the management of lumbar disc herniation patients, with particularly scarce information regarding the effect of patient education in treatment compliance. Therefore, it is important and necessary the development of future clinical studies to help standardize reporting across medical practice in the context of lumbar disc herniation pathology.

Indexed as

Lumbar disk herniationPatient educationSystematic reviewTreatment complianceTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41141970
PMCPMC12547315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.