ArticleBrain & spine2025
Surgeon-specific differences in recurrence rates among patients undergoing burr hole evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) frequently recurs. Numerous studies have investigated the influence of various factors on the likelihood of recurrence, yet the potential influence of individual surgeon identity beyond general experience level remains unclear. Research question: To evaluate whether surgeon-specific differences contribute to recurrence rates whilst accounting for standardized technique and known patient-/procedure-related factors. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of burr hole evacuation for cSDH or hygroma at a single tertiary center. Standardized surgical technique involved two burr holes with subdural lavage and drainage placement. Primary outcome was symptomatic recurrence necessitating redo surgery. Surgeon-specific variability in recurrence was assessed via three statistical methods: risk-standardized observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios, logistic generalized estimating equations (GEE), and hierarchical Bayesian logistic modeling, adjusted for covariates. Results: Among 116 patients (age = 78.0 years, 75.0 % = male, 26.7 % = bilateral procedures), symptomatic recurrence occurred in 15 cases (12.9 %). Risk-standardized-O/E recurrence ratios varied from 0.00 to 1.65, with wide confidence intervals indicating uncertainty, but all within expected ranges (median O/E = 1.11, IQR = 0.60-1.45). GEE analysis demonstrated significant surgeon-specific clustering (ICC = 0.61, large effect), indicating between-surgeon differences could explain more than half of the remaining variance in recurrence. Bayesian hierarchical modeling showed moderate surgeon-specific clustering with an ICC = 0.14, indicating that between-surgeon differences accounted for approximately 14 % of total variance in recurrence. Discussion and conclusions: Our study demonstrates modest yet measurable surgeon-specific differences in recurrence rates following standardized burr-hole evacuation for cSDH. These findings support further investigation into surgeon-specific variability, particularly for more complex procedures, to identify actionable technical differences and optimize surgical outcomes universally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.