ReviewBrain & spine2025
Prevalence, diagnosis, and clinical significance of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: A systematic review and narrative analysis.
Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Statistical shape modelling of the human lumbar spine: a scoping review characterising the research landscape and potential clinical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Discordance Between Anatomical Nerve Root Compression and Functional Radiculopathy in Patients with Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae (LSTV) are congenital anomalies at the L5-S1 segment, involving sacralization of the lowest lumbar vertebra or lumbarization of the highest sacral segment. Despite their clinical importance, a comprehensive systematic review addressing the prevalence, diagnosis, and clinical significance of LSTV remains limited. Research question: This study aims to systematically review and synthesize current evidence regarding the prevalence, diagnostic methods, and clinical significance of LSTV. Material and methods: An extensive literature search was undertaken across PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases to identify studies pertinent to the prevalence, diagnostic criteria, and clinical outcomes related to LSTV. All studies that satisfied our inclusion and exclusion criteria were methodically analyzed and included in this systematic review. Results: The mean prevalence of LSTV is 15.3 %, ranging from 4.5 % to 35.6 %, with higher occurrence in patients presenting with low back pain, disc herniation, and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). LSTV is diagnosed through imaging techniques such as X-ray, CT, and MRI, while symptomatic LSTV and Far-Out Syndrome (FOS) require clinical assessment, imaging, and diagnostic injections. LSTV is associated with an increased risk of nerve root compression, disc herniation, altered spinal pelvic parameters, and surgical complications including screw misplacement and vascular injury. Discussion and conclusion: Given LSTV's prevalence, surgical planning, including segment election and precise measurements, must account for LSTV's presence and its impact on disease progression. More research with larger samples and longer follow-ups is needed to elucidate these clinical implications and enhance therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.