ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Best evidence summary on anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trimodal prehabilitation for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A best evidence summary.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: This was an evidence summary study conducted in strict accordance with the reporting standards of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing. According to the evidence pyramid "6S" model, the search was performed from top to bottom. The following databases were searched: BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, YiMaiTong Guidelines Network, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Professional association websites included those of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, British Society for Haematology, and the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The search period was from the inception of each database to October 2024. Literature types included clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: A total of 19 studies were included, comprising three clinical decisions, 10 guidelines, one expert consensus, four systematic reviews, and one RCT. Thirty-four pieces of evidence were synthesized across eight aspects: risk factor assessment, timing of anticoagulation, drug selection, treatment duration, management of recurrence, safety monitoring, health education, and follow-up care. Conclusions: This study summarizes the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated VTE. When applying this evidence clinically, health care providers should thoroughly evaluate the feasibility and appropriateness of each recommendation to develop clinical decisions tailored to China's national conditions and health care resources. Systematic review registration: This study has been registered on the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244015).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.