Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141956›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Expanding Pharmacists' Prescribing Authority and Medication Uptake: Evidence From Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis.

Bita Fayaz-Farkhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bita Fayaz-FarkhadAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Assessing the Impact of Economic Policies on the Use of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the United StatesK01AI172614 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAYAZ FARKHAD, BITA · 2023 to 2025
$369k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI172614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the crisis in access to care in the U.S., pharmacies are expected to significantly expand access to a variety of preventive care, including HIV care. As of August 2024, 10 states allow pharmacists to initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis, a medicine taken to prevent HIV, independently. This study analyzed how the expansion of pharmacists' authority to independently initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis affected pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates per 100,000 county residents. Methods: Hand-collected data on pharmacists' prescribing authority from 2015 to 2023 were linked to county-level pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates. Using these data, the impact of the laws was estimated through a difference-in-differences approach. The analysis first calculated changes in pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates before and after the expansions and then compared these changes between counties in states that expanded pharmacists' scope of practice (treatment group) and counties in states that did not (control group). Results: Expanding pharmacists' prescribing authority increased pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates by 11.6%. The largest effects were observed in states that allowed pharmacists to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis without any mandatory training, a requirement that may otherwise burden pharmacists. Effects were most prominent in nonrural counties and counties with high insurance coverage and lower proportions of Black and Latinx populations. Conclusions: These results suggest that expanding pharmacists' prescribing authority will not improve disparities in pre-exposure prophylaxis use if the laws fail to address structural barriers, such as staffing constraints or a lack of capacity.

Indexed as

HIV preventive carePharmacists’ prescribing authority

Identifiers

PMID41141956
PMCPMC12547906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.