ArticleAJPM focus2025
Expanding Pharmacists' Prescribing Authority and Medication Uptake: Evidence From Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Communication Between PrEP-Eligible Latino Men: an Egocentric Analysis of Dyadic Characteristics and Behaviors.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- State HIV Prevention Policy Environments and HIV Prevention Outcomes: Racial and Ethnic Differences in the United States.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Trends in Pharmacist-Prescribed Dispensing Records of HIV Pre-Exposure (2020-2025) and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (2020-2024) in Brazil: A Time Series Analysis.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- "O for KP": an evidence review on recentering HIV prevention and PrEP delivery for key populations and the underserved.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Role of pharmacists in HIV prophylaxis: a scoping review of pharmacists' services, interventions and outcomes.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Considering the crisis in access to care in the U.S., pharmacies are expected to significantly expand access to a variety of preventive care, including HIV care. As of August 2024, 10 states allow pharmacists to initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis, a medicine taken to prevent HIV, independently. This study analyzed how the expansion of pharmacists' authority to independently initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis affected pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates per 100,000 county residents. Methods: Hand-collected data on pharmacists' prescribing authority from 2015 to 2023 were linked to county-level pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates. Using these data, the impact of the laws was estimated through a difference-in-differences approach. The analysis first calculated changes in pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates before and after the expansions and then compared these changes between counties in states that expanded pharmacists' scope of practice (treatment group) and counties in states that did not (control group). Results: Expanding pharmacists' prescribing authority increased pre-exposure prophylaxis prescription rates by 11.6%. The largest effects were observed in states that allowed pharmacists to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis without any mandatory training, a requirement that may otherwise burden pharmacists. Effects were most prominent in nonrural counties and counties with high insurance coverage and lower proportions of Black and Latinx populations. Conclusions: These results suggest that expanding pharmacists' prescribing authority will not improve disparities in pre-exposure prophylaxis use if the laws fail to address structural barriers, such as staffing constraints or a lack of capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.