ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
A Chinese question and answer system for liver cancer based on knowledge graph and large language mode.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The liver cancer question-and-answer (Q&A) system is primarily intended to help patients access disease-related information more conveniently. However, there is currently no Q&A system specifically developed for liver cancer. Additionally, most existing Q&A systems lack real clinical data and have limited capability in understanding Chinese questions. Methods: This paper proposes a Chinese liver cancer question-answering system based on knowledge graphs and Large Language Models (LLMs). To unify information from diverse sources, the system employs a knowledge graph to store entities and inter-entity relationships extracted from patients' clinical electronic medical records and the professional medical website xywy.com, which serves as the foundation for the system's responses. Specifically, ChatGLM3.5 is utilized to extract entity information from questions, while BERT is applied to understand users' intent. Subsequently, the system retrieves corresponding information from the knowledge graph. Finally, the retrieved information is integrated, and a natural language response is generated as the answer to the question. Results: The experimental results indicate that in terms of intent classification, our system achieves a precision of 92.34%, representing an improvement of 1.38% over the BERT model and 4.32% over the GEBERT model. In terms of response relevance, the system's outputs are more aligned with patients' daily speech patterns and exhibit higher relevance to the target questions. Discussion: In conclusion, the improved method significantly enhances the usefulness and reliability of the liver cancer Q&A system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.