Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141906›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

A Chinese question and answer system for liver cancer based on knowledge graph and large language mode.

Haoqi Wu, Min Zhang, Hailing Wang, Xiaoyan Jiang, Yongbin Gao, Rong Huang, Zhijun Fang, Xiaojun Hu, Yingfang Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haoqi Wu *School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University Of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
Min Zhang *Department of Endocrinology, Ninth Hospital of Xi'an, Xian, China.
Hailing WangSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University Of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyan JiangSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University Of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
Yongbin GaoSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University Of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
Rong HuangSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University Of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
Zhijun FangSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University Of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
Xiaojun HuThe Hepatobiliary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingfang FanThe Hepatobiliary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The liver cancer question-and-answer (Q&A) system is primarily intended to help patients access disease-related information more conveniently. However, there is currently no Q&A system specifically developed for liver cancer. Additionally, most existing Q&A systems lack real clinical data and have limited capability in understanding Chinese questions. Methods: This paper proposes a Chinese liver cancer question-answering system based on knowledge graphs and Large Language Models (LLMs). To unify information from diverse sources, the system employs a knowledge graph to store entities and inter-entity relationships extracted from patients' clinical electronic medical records and the professional medical website xywy.com, which serves as the foundation for the system's responses. Specifically, ChatGLM3.5 is utilized to extract entity information from questions, while BERT is applied to understand users' intent. Subsequently, the system retrieves corresponding information from the knowledge graph. Finally, the retrieved information is integrated, and a natural language response is generated as the answer to the question. Results: The experimental results indicate that in terms of intent classification, our system achieves a precision of 92.34%, representing an improvement of 1.38% over the BERT model and 4.32% over the GEBERT model. In terms of response relevance, the system's outputs are more aligned with patients' daily speech patterns and exhibit higher relevance to the target questions. Discussion: In conclusion, the improved method significantly enhances the usefulness and reliability of the liver cancer Q&A system.

Indexed as

data integrationknowledge graphlarge language modelliver cancerquestion and answer system

Identifiers

PMID41141906
PMCPMC12549698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.