ArticleCureus2025
Intraperitoneal Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device in a Patient With a Kidney Stone: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Small bowel necrosis caused by migrated intrauterine device: a rare surgical emergency.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report presents a rare case of a previously placed intrauterine device (IUD) subsequently found freely floating in the peritoneal cavity in a patient presenting with a kidney stone. A woman in her early 30s with a history of levonorgestrel IUD placement four years prior presented to the emergency department with sudden-onset, sharp, severe left lower quadrant pain. A CT scan demonstrated a 5 mm obstructing ureteral stone in the distal left ureter as well as an IUD in the inferior peritoneal cavity with no free air or bowel injury. This case, in the context of current literature surrounding migrated and perforated IUDs, is evaluated and presented in the following report. The device was successfully retrieved laparoscopically without incident. Intraoperative inspection showed no uterine perforation at the time of laparoscopy, no adhesions, and no involvement of adjacent structures or organs. Postoperative follow-up was conducted to assess recovery and symptom resolution. Intraperitoneal migration of IUDs, although rare, can occur and may remain asymptomatic for several years. Migration may be complicated by adhesions, perforation, and infection. However, ectopic IUDs may alternatively be free-floating in the peritoneal cavity without complications. Laparoscopic retrieval is safe and effective, and this can be considered the preferred method of retrieval in most cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.