Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141864›Full record

ArticleUrban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025

Anticipatory climate governance: Limits to current practices in Montreal.

Hélène Madénian, Sophie L Van Neste, Alexis Guillemard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hélène MadénianInstitut national de la recherche scientifique, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8158-9563
Sophie L Van NesteInstitut national de la recherche scientifique, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-4879
Alexis GuillemardCentre d' étude en responsabilité sociale et écocitoyenneté (CÉRSÉ), Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

City leadership appears key in driving the transition towards a liveable future. Trying to bring specific visions of the future into present decisions and actions is what anticipatory governance is about. However, the literature has highlighted a lack of discussion of the use of anticipatory practices in urban climate governance. What anticipatory practices do cities employ to tackle climate change and work towards a desirable future? What limitations does it involve? The City of Montreal provides an effective case study as, recently, it has been the locus of large projects representative of the three dominant approaches of climate action-climate planning, carbon control and reporting and experimentation. Our results indicate that traditional tools such as reporting, urban planning regulations and bylaws are the strategies urban actors rely on to advance towards desirable futures. And yet, they seem to be missing opportunities to act in the present for these desirable futures, especially to increase equity in urban climate action. This research offers a concrete and empirical exploration of cities' anticipatory practices regarding climate change, ultimately contributing to the literature on anticipatory urban climate governance.

Indexed as

anticipatory governanceclimate governanceenvironmentgovernancelocal governmentplanningsustainability

Identifiers

PMID41141864
PMCPMC12548956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.