Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025

Skills and epistemic cultures in artificial intelligence research: evidence from job postings.

Anamaria Nastasa, Monica Mihaela Maer Matei, Cosima Rughiniş, Dinu Ţurcanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anamaria NastasaDepartment of Education, Training and Labour Market, National Scientific Research Institute for Labor and Social Protection (INCSMPS), Bucharest, Romania.
Monica Mihaela Maer MateiDepartment of Education, Training and Labour Market, National Scientific Research Institute for Labor and Social Protection (INCSMPS), Bucharest, Romania.
Cosima RughinişFaculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Dinu ŢurcanuFaculty of Electronics and Telecommunications and National Institute of Innovations in Cybersecurity "CYBERCOR", Technical University of Moldova, Chişinău, Moldova.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has begun to transform the labor market, allowing technologies to perform some of the tasks previously performed only by humans. Previous studies have shown that artificial intelligence technologies have reshaped workplaces and tasks structures, generating new skill demands in the labor market. However, there is limited research on how the required skills and underlying epistemic orientations of AI-related academic jobs are communicated during the hiring process. The present study explores this discursive construction of the researcher role by analyzing the skills and competencies prioritized in AI-related academic job postings. To achieve the study's goals, we used data on job descriptions from around 800 jobs posted on the EURAXESS platform until January 2024 using descriptive text mining methods and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling. The findings revealed a strong demand for research and digital skills, as well as career development, communication, mobility, and enterprise skills. The results also reveal seven distinct thematic clusters, which we interpret as representations of different epistemic cultures being signaled to prospective candidates. The results can be valuable for policymakers, research institutions, and universities.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceepistemic culturesresearchersskillsskills needstext mining

Identifiers

PMID41141861
PMCPMC12549694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.