Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41141860›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025

Unveiling the master narratives of a sample of STEM students at an urban public college in New York City.

Krystal Reynoso, Fadel Ismail, Daniela Ávila, Maria Isabel Roldós

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krystal ReynosoLehman College, Bronx, NY, United States.
Fadel IsmailLehman College, Bronx, NY, United States.
Daniela ÁvilaLehman College, Bronx, NY, United States.
Maria Isabel RoldósLehman College, Bronx, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This brief research report presents how rigid STEM narratives are perceived by undergraduate students from diverse backgrounds at an urban Minority Serving Institution (MSI) in NYC. This research focuses on student voices and reveals the unique challenges, motivations, and strengths they bring to STEM. A total of 15 peer to peer qualitative interviews were conducted between May and December of 2024. Content analyses using an inductive approach was used to cross code between the interviewers and student participants using content analyses revealed key themes such as: the importance of time management support, diverse mentorship, the role of parents and family members, among others. Findings illustrate that representation and authentic support significantly impact student success. Recommendations to address barriers and proposals of supportive solutions designed to break down STEM stereotypes to serve undergraduate students from diverse backgrounds.

Indexed as

immigrant studentsMSInarrativesNYC 4STEM

Identifiers

PMID41141860
PMCPMC12550941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.